Skip to content
United Future New ZealandUnited Future New Zealand
United Future New Zealand
United Future New Zealand
  • Who are we and what we believe
    • Principles
    • Policies
    • Your UnitedFuture Candidates
    • Your UnitedFuture Board
    • A Proud History
    • Achievements In Government
    • Part of a Global Movement
  • Recent Statements
  • Who are we and what we believe
    • Principles
    • Policies
    • Your UnitedFuture Candidates
    • Your UnitedFuture Board
    • A Proud History
    • Achievements In Government
    • Part of a Global Movement
  • Recent Statements

This week I had the privilege of representing UnitedFuture at the Financial Services Council (FSC) election debate on savings and retirement. We covered a range of issues, but I spoke at length about our FlexiSuper policy.

FlexiSuper allows people to take a reduced rate of New Zealand superannuation from the age of 60, or an enhanced rate if they deferred uptake until 70.

Apart from being cost-neutral,  I’m a huge fan because of it creates fairness and choice. While only 30, I’m not planning to retire until I’m at least 70 (like my grandfather did), so this policy is perfect for me (and others thinking the same).

But more importantly, it recognises that for some people 60 is the age to leave the paid workforce, but they’re currently unable to do so for financial reasons. It’s especially hard on those who’ve worked in manual labour or suffered due to low income and poor health.

In short – it provides fairness and choice for everyone.

After I spoke, each party representative that stood up made a point of why FlexiSuper didn’t work. I don’t mind a disagreement on policy. What I found bizarre, was they then talked about why we should allow people to shift the age they got superannuation to make it fairer. They had no actual plan, no costings, no policy.

Basically, they disagreed with UnitedFuture because they felt they should. Only David Parker (Labour) had a reason (other than “no”) and its hardly a show stopper (its a risk that taking it early is too attractive).  Other countries have a similar system (including USA, France, Japan, Germany, Sweden and the UK) and it works for them.

Instead of actually doing something to help out those that need it and giving choice to all New Zealanders, the other parties seem to have decided that talking about what they wish they could do is better.

It feels like politics for the sake of politics.

While other parties are talking about what they might do, we’re actually doing something about it. Our FlexiSuper discussion paper has been released and feedback collected.

Vote for a party that gets things done, vote UnitedFuture.

Category: Latest ViewsBy Damian LightAugust 29, 2014

Post navigation

PreviousPrevious post:2035AD or decline of nation?NextNext post:Four Dynamics of Foreign Policy

Related posts

UnitedFuture proud of it’s history, but all good things must end
November 14, 2017
While we wait, what could’ve been – our coalition priorities
October 12, 2017
We need to talk about immigration without being racist
October 8, 2017
Thank you for all your support
September 24, 2017
UnitedFuture calls out parties on their claims to support families
September 19, 2017
UnitedFuture finds itself again the lone voice calling for drug reform
September 18, 2017

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published.

clear formPost comment

United Future New Zealand
Authorised by D Light, 1/7 Fencotie Place, Northpark, Auckland. All Rights Reserved United Future New Zealand 2017