Get a Gravatar from gravatar.com

United Future
Since: Aug 2007
Posts: 314

Feed for this Topic

POLL: Is a one-off payment to households of $112 in the year 2010 enough compensation to pass the ETS?

Is a one-off payment to households of $112 in the year 2010 enough compensation to pass the ETS? See the results.

Get a Gravatar from gravatar.com

Damian Light
Since: Aug 2007
Posts: 36

Send email

A sick joke - we can only hope !! What's the point in hurting NZers while failing to help NZ ??

Get a Gravatar from gravatar.com

Kelleigh Sheffield-Cranstoun
Since: Apr 2008
Posts: 31

That is almost laughable. If ETS is going to affect households by rising their costs in tough times, what is that measly sum going to compensate for? Its a cheap tube of toothpaste a week. Ridiculous.

Get a Gravatar from gravatar.com

mcinnes
Since: Apr 2008
Posts: 53

Is that about a packet of chewing gum a week... or a block of cheese a month?

Get a Gravatar from gravatar.com

Kelleigh Sheffield-Cranstoun
Since: Apr 2008
Posts: 31

I should clarify, what the proposed ETS is aiming to achieve is a good thing, but this is not the way to implement it - hitting people where it hurts. People don't have an endless supply of money to give!

Get a Gravatar from gravatar.com

peter dunne
Since: May 2008
Posts: 38

Kelleigh is absolutely right. The aim is good and hard to argue against - the implementation though will hit households hard.

Get a Gravatar from gravatar.com

liberalcentrist
Since: May 2008
Posts: 27

The point that appears to have been overlooked is that National, in signing up to Kyoto Accords, has saddled us with commitments which NZ must pay. The only choice is whether companies that create carbon emissions should pay towards the cost or taxpayers should pick up the whole tab. The ETS is an attempt to get the carbon emmitters to pay their dues.

Obviously it's going to cost transport users and householders something. But if we don't pay it as petrol users and coal consumers (which at least has the advantage of encouraging fuel conservation) then we'll have to pay it through tax. I'd rather that the big polluters paid their share too.

Please login to post a reply. Go to Login page »