Get a Gravatar from gravatar.com

United Future
Since: Aug 2007
Posts: 314

Feed for this Topic

Is electricity a basic human right or a commodity to be paid for?

==Poll Outcome==

Basic Right – 37%
Commodity – 63%

This is a question that really illustrates the divide between the different sides of the political spectrum. While most New Zealanders expect a high level of service from their electricity supplier at a relatively low cost, the result of the United Future poll shows that nearly two-thirds of people accept that electricity is a commodity rather than a basic human right. In saying that, while 100 years ago electricity could be considered a luxury in the household, we, in the developed world have become so reliant on it for heating, lighting and cooking it could be argued that electricity has become a basic human right.

There are those who advocate that there is no need and it is in fact duplicitous for power companies to make a profit. Power companies should exist to provide cost-price electricity for New Zealanders in an efficient and environmentally sound manner.
... Read the full text of this article.

Get a Gravatar from gravatar.com

angryBob
Since: Aug 2007
Posts: 12

Electricity and water
Two utilities and yet two seemingly opposite views

See these two links for water and electricity polls on this site.

People seem to be of the opinion that electricity is a commodity but water is a basic human right.

Yet both are more or less the same as far as supply is concerned.
Someone has to pay for laying of pipes and the maintenance of the same to deliver water just as someone has to pay for cable laying for delivery of electricity.
The same applies to the source of water and electicity, Pumps-generators, booster pumps-substations.

Surely if the government has an obligation to supply one at cost then they should also be supplying the other. Or should both be subject to market forces?

Please login to post a reply. Go to Login page »